So much of the heat (and not light) that’s shed on real estate market writing contains the implicit assumption that falling prices are bad.

Are falling prices bad? Well, they are if you have no choice but to sell now, and you owe more than you own.

Falling prices are also bad if you’re buying and your position is such that you’ll have to sell while prices are still falling.

For everyone else, falling prices are much less of a catastrophe than melting ice caps, because we’re likely to see the situation turn around in a relatively short term.

Falling prices are actually good if you want an investment 1) that you can afford and 2) that provides positive cash flow.

For the longest time, I didn’t see too many properties that penciled out positive in Sacramento County. Today I stubbed my toe on a condo that seemed offhand to pencil out so well that I threw some conservative numbers such as a 25% vacancy rate at it, and I still ended up $5 per month in the black.

There’s probably an improvement of $100 per month that one could make in the vacancy rate, and you can take out the $85 per month in management fees if you want to rent it out yourself. The other thing that’s conservative about this analysis is that this is based on the list price of the home. On the flip side one should inquire about utilities and factor in an estimate for maintenance.

Granted, five bucks is not a lot of money. But lots of folks who bought when it was “a good time” because prices were going up were happy enough to be upside down by hundreds of dollars. (Like the seller of this condo — which is now bank owned? Could be!)

Cash Flow Worksheet

blog comments powered by Disqus