Lockwood Real Estate

  • Search
  • Home Value
  • Foreclosures
  • Email Listings
  • Advice
  • About
  • Contact Us

Blog

23 Jan

Sacramento County Condos – 2007 Market Year in Review

Posted January 23rd, 2008 | View Comments

Our recent Sacramento Real Estate Year in Review article covered condos as well as other residential types like single family homes and halfplexes.  Today we turn to our attention to condos only, to see how they compare to the general category. 

When I looked at the numbers, the results were surprising given the traditional wisdom that condos are the first to fall in a down market and the last to rise in an up market.

Comparing 2006 to 2007 overall for all of Sacramento County, we find that the average condo sold in 2007 for $236,914, down 6.9% from 2006′s average of $254,370.  2007′s median price for a condo was $218,000, down 7.2% from last year’s median of $235,000.  On a sold price per square foot basis, the average condo’s value fell 10.8% during the same period, from $218.16 in 2006 to $194.51 in 2007.

As we saw for residential units overall, the numbers from December to December were more dramatic than the year to year numbers.  Sacramento County Condo values fell some 18.7% on a sold price per square foot basis from 2006 to 2007.  Though of course that’s a non-trivial drop, it’s somewhat smaller than the sold price per square foot drop of 21.8% from December to December for the residential category generally.

I suspect the traditional wisdom that condos are the big losers in a down market fails to take into effect the slight but real differences in the number of foreclosures on condos.  Among all residential categories, the number of bank owned foreclosures (REOs) sold in December was 47.2% of all sales — for condos that number was 28.1%.  Similarly in active inventory, short sales and REOs make up 55.7% of inventory for all residential units, but 46.4% for condos. 

There are two possible reasons for this.  The more obvious one is that condos are cheaper, so buyers were less overextended and therefore slightly less likely to default.  Another possibility — but I haven’t researched it so I only raise it as a conjecture — is that it’s possible more condos were owner occupied and fewer were purchased as investments. 

Whatever the reason, a slightly lower default rate has helped condos retain their value somewhat better than residential properties generally.

  • http://realestateinscottsdaleaz.com Phoenix az real estate

    All things considered, that’s not too bad. I’ve seen worse numbers.

  • http://www.freenevadamove.com Reno Real Estate

    John,

    Another thought. Perhaps this is because the typical condo is selling for much less than the typical home. As a result, the % decrease will be less based on the “absolute” dollar range these can effectively go down (based on owners mortgage amount, etc.).

    Mitch

  • http://www.sacramento-home.com/real-estate-agents/ John Lockwood

    Yes, that may be a possibility too, good point Mitch.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Search Sacramento Area MLS

Keep Up To Date

  • Subscribe via RSS Free updates via a Reader
  • Subscribe via Email Free updates via Email
  • Twitter Updates Follow me on Twitter
  • Facebook Page Become a Fan

Recent Posts

  • Actualización de mercado Bienes Raíces sacramento – Perdición, Melancolía y Adquisición de Vivienda
    August 15th, 2011

  • Google+ Comes to Sacramento Real Estate Site (Watch for my Mug on Google)
    August 8th, 2011

  • Sacramento Real Estate Market Update – Doom, Gloom, and Housing Affordability
    July 27th, 2011

Popular Posts

  • Sacramento Home Prices Rose Again in February
    March 8th, 2006

  • CONTEST — Pick The Best Sign
    February 28th, 2007

  • Are Short Sales Fake Listings? Part 1
    May 14th, 2008

Browse local areas: Sacramento County | El Dorado County | Placer County

Visit us on Google+

John Lockwood Associates. DRE License #01768758. Information in this web site comes from multiple sources and is believed accurate but has not been verified.

Copyright © 2012 John Lockwood Associates. All rights reserved.