The Rich Get Richure, The Poor Get Foreclosure

Posted by John Lockwood on August 25th, 2007

A number of social justice activists and others have pointed out the relationship between race and poverty and predatory lending practices. For example, the Center for Responsible Lending has published a study on Unfair Lending: The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on the Price of Subprime Mortgages, documenting that African-American and Latino borrowers receive sub-prime loans more often than white borrowers, even when their credit history and other lending qualifications may qualify them for a more inexpensive loan.

Unfortunately, the geographical pattern of REO (Real Estate Owned, or “Bank Repo”) sales in the greater Sacramento area tends to support the idea that the link between predatory lending and race may be a very real one indeed. I recently examined the percentage of sales that were foreclosures (REOs) for the period January 1st, 2007 to August 21, 2007. Aside from a few statistical oddities, overall the pattern was pretty clearly one in which the most foreclosures occurred in the poorest neighborhoods.

Of course, just based on such a study, it’s impossible to say how much predatory lending is the culprit, and how much can be attributed to the rather banal idea that living in poverty may make the choice between food and the mortgage more of a common one than it is for rich people.

Community Zip Code Total # of properties sold # of Foreclosures Percentage of Foreclosures
Florin 95830 4 0 0.0%
Rancho Cordova 95742 41 1 2.4%
Downtown 95814 30 1 3.3%
East Sac 95819 176 6 3.4%
Granite Bay 95746 194 10 5.2%
Folsom 95630 579 33 5.7%
El Dorado Hills 95672 391 26 6.6%
Elk Grove 95757 233 29 12.4%
Sacramento (County-wide) 7468 937 12.5%
Elk Grove 95758 377 50 13.3%
Rosemont 95826 194 27 13.9%
Antelope 95843 298 44 14.8%
East Sac 95817 93 18 19.4%
Florin 95829 128 25 19.5%
Foothill Farms 95842 153 33 21.6%
Florin 95828 221 52 23.5%
Franklin/Freeport 95823 205 51 24.9%
Franklin/Freeport 95832 33 15 45.5%