Sacramento Real Estate Blog

Greetings, market statistics fans!  Straighten up those pocket protectors and hang on to your slide rules, because it’s time once again for us to catch up on our REM sleep with yet another thrilling installment of our never-ending saga:  Sacramento (County) Real Estate Market Updates!

And the crowds went wild.

The good news:  905 units sold in February, up some ten per cent from January.  Unit volume was even up marginally from last February — and, yes, this still holds true when you adjust for the leap year.  February’s unit volume was the highest since last July, when 977 units sold.

The average home sold for $273,603 in February, up slightly over January’s average of $269,301, but down 29.9% from last February’s average sale price of $390,043.  The median sale price of $249,000 was down 29.2% from last February’s median of $353,000.  Sold price per square foot is down 28.8% from February to February, at $162.76 this year versus $228.63 last year.

The 905 units that sold in February is not bad for a late winter month where the average over the preceding twelve months was 968 units per month.  Currently there are 9,866 homes on the market, which works out to be 10.2 months of inventory.  33.9% of the homes in active inventory are short sales, but as we’ve reported earlier and a variety of our colleagues in other markets have reported since, the closing rate for short sales is much lower, at 6.6% in February.  Bank foreclosures (REOs), in contrast, make up 28% of the current active inventory (2,763 of the 9,866 available units), but in February they accounted for 59.2% of the homes that sold in Sacramento County (542 out of 905 total sales).

Related links:

We’ve updated our listings database.  It was getting pretty long in the tooth there.

Most people who are users of our web site(s) probably don’t know it, but many of our web sites including this one, our Roseville real estate site and our Elite Properties company site actually rely on two different databases of listings.  When you use our search page, for example, you’re using a listings database that’s our IDX company gets from our Metrolist database.  These listings are updated daily, so when you do a search, you’re looking at listings that are within twenty-four hours of being as current as the ones that we as Realtors® can look at..

In addition to the search tools that our IDX company provides, however, we also wanted to allow you to browse for certain types of listings.  One thing our IDX system doesn’t do, for example, is show you short sales and foreclosures.  Because we don’t have direct access to the database our IDX company uses, we’ve created a second database that we can use in various ways.

For example, our foreclosure search page lets you search for foreclosures and short sales, or browse them by county.  Similarly our new homes section let’s you see homes that have just been built that are listed in the MLS, and our condo pages contain links to condos grouped by price and county.

As we mentioned above, we’ve also used this database on some of our other sites.  Many clients find us through our the maps of listings by zip code that we maintain on our company site.  These maps include zip codes in El Dorado County, Placer County, and Sacramento County.  Within each zip code you can find active listings and get recent market data.  We publish similar data for Placer County only on our Roseville site.

Unlike our IDX system, which is updated automatically on a daily basis, these other resources are updated manually as time permits.

We realize that from a software perspective, that’s not the brightest way to do it.  But if you’ve ever tried to get someone from Metrolist to call you back about a data feed, you probably have a good idea that it’s not half-dumb from an organizational perspective.

The good news is, it’s up to date now.  So as my wife is fond of saying, “Get your red hot houses here!”

Enjoy.

Related links:

I took a few minutes today to look at the discounts for short sales and foreclosures based simply on list prices.  In other words — how much are they discounted before you negotiate with the seller? 

Foreclosures may have a little more negotiating room between list price and sale price, but not as much as you may think.  The reason is that homes that are priced well to begin with tend to get more competition, so even in the case of bank owned foreclosures, buyers typically only negotiate something between 5-6% off the list price for foreclosures, as compared to about 4% for all sales.

The real bulk of the discounts for foreclosures and short sales already appears in the MLS.

So with that, let’s look at the results.  How much are foreclosures and short sales discounted in Sacramento County?

In active inventory, the list price for non-distressed sales are currently averaging $228.62 per square foot.  Short sales are discounted, on average, 27.8%, with the average list price for short sales being $165.00 per square foot.  Foreclosures are discounted even more — 36% compared to non-distressed sales — with the average REO in Sacramento County currently listed at $146.19 per square foot.

One caveat, however.  If you look at short sales and foreclosures on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis, you generally see foreclosures still having better discounts than short sales — but the overall magnitude of the discounts are somewhat less than they are when you look at the entire county.  This is because part of the 27.8% and 36% numbers reported above reflects the fact that in many cases more expensive areas also have fewer foreclosures. 

In Antelope, for example, Short Sales are currently listed at a discount of 26.3%, and foreclosures are currently discounted 30%, from their non-distressed counterparts.

“Only” 30% off?  That’s still not bad!

Related links:

In our Sacramento Real Estate Market Update for January, Part I, I began rounding up the usual statistical suspects, but I decided to leave some of them to a future post, since I wanted to spend some time in part one having a discussion about the recent upsurge in demand.

Left out of part one was a discussion of where we are with respect to foreclosures and short sales. In January of 2007, foreclosures and short sales collectively made up only 7.3% of all sales. Foreclosures accounted for 4.6% of all sales, while short sales accounted for 2.7% of all sales. That’s about one home in every thirteen.

In January of 2008, in contrast, foreclosures and short sales accounted for 67%, or just over two out of every three sold homes. Of these, the vast majority are foreclosures, which accounted for 60.5% of the total sales in January, even though they only make up 27.5% of the current active inventory. Short sales make up even more of the active inventory at 32.1%, but in January only 6.5% of closed transactions were short sales.

Related links:

Depending on where you focus your attention, there’s news, there’s good news, and there’s bad news.

We began our look back on Sacramento County real estate in 2007 with a look at the overall “big picture” for the Sacramento County Real Estate Market for the entire year. Later last week, we reported on one area in the county market that’s consistently held it’s value better than others and enjoy’s low inventory and brisk sales, East Sacramento.

This week we turn our attention to an area that may well be the “worst case” in terms of rising inventory and price declines for Sacramento County, Sacramento’s Franklin / Freeport area (95823). I should probably point out before we begin that I have not sampled all the MLS areas, so my sense that Franklin / Freeport may be the worst case comes from the foreclosure numbers. There may be other areas that have fewer foreclosures but more inventory or lower prices, for example.

Franklin’s decline in 2007 has been rapid. Comparing full year numbers first, the average price lost 19.2% of its value from year to year, and dropped 21.1% in terms of sold price per square foot. The median sale price in 2006 was $314,850, in 2007 it fell 20.6% to $250,000. In 2006 one per cent of sales in Franklin were foreclosures. In 2007, that number was 41.6%.

Comparing December of 2007 to December of 2006, we find that by December, the trend of selling more and more foreclosures and deep price drops had continued apace. By the end of 2006 the average sale price was $282,327. A year later the average had fallen 34.9% to $183,914. Another way to say this is that the average home in Franklin lost slightly more than 1/3 of its value in a year. On a sold price per square foot basis, Franklin closed out 2006 at $200.21 per square foot, and had fallen to $126.61 a year later, a decline of 35.8%.

The percentages of short sales and foreclosures available in Franklin / Freeport are staggering. Almost three fourths (73.9%) of inventory in Franklin / Freeport is either a short sale (35.9%) or foreclosure (38.1%). At the same time, if you needed a case study of REOs outselling short sales, Franklin / Freeport is it. Last month no short sales closed, but twenty-five of the twenty-nine closed sales in the area were bank owned properties. That works out to 86.2%, or close to 7/8 of all sales.

The contrast between East Sacramento on the one hand and Franklin / Freeport on the other shows how local real estate markets are. East Sac enjoys less than three months of inventory and a brisk seller’s market where the prices have remained flat while nationwide prices are falling, while Franklin / Freeport currently has almost two years (23.6 months) of inventory, and homes there have lost two thirds of it’s value in a year.

If you’re a buyer or seller, the right question to ask is not “How’s the Market” overall, but “How’s the Market” for your particular area. Is there an area you’re interested in particularly? If so please contact us and we’d be happy to get you specific market data or comparable sales.

Related links:

In movies, 2007 was the year of the threequel.  Sensibly enough, Beyonce Knowles was the year’s most desirable woman (I’ve been saying that since 2006, at least).  Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize, while the arctic ice cap melted at an alarming rate.

In Sacramento real estate, I’ll remember 2007 as the year when those of us who entered the business early in the decade learned the mechanics of selling short sales and foreclosures. 2007 was the year of the foreclosure in Sacramento County. 

This chart shows the number of foreclosures sold month by month through November of 2007 in blue.  The short sales are shown in pink.

Short Sale “Time Lag”?

About a month ago, a reader responded to my post about the dismally low closing rate for short sales by remarking that my analysis failed to account for the fact that short sales take longer than foreclosures to sell.

The chart above does not show short sales lagging behind foreclosures by the 1-3 months it takes to sell them.  It shows a steady increase in the number of REOs sold.  REOs broke the 10% barrier in April, and short sales have yet to rise above 6%.  The longest short sale I’ve done took four months — sometimes we can close them in 30-60 days.  If short sales were lagging four months behind, not just failing to close, there should be at least 18% of them closing every month by now.

Another problem with this argument is this.  Yes, short sales take longer, but the short sale step also happens before the bank owns the property.  So these sales take longer, but they also start earlier, so the longer sale should be a wash, and clearly the numbers above show that it isn’t.

Related links:

The numbers are in for November.  As we get into what’s usually a slow time of year, unit volume is continuing to rise slowly from September and October, with 809 units selling as against October’s 803 and September’s rather bleak 709 units.  Buyers are beginning to take advantage of the bargains offered by short sales and REOs (bank foreclosures) in inventory, which collectively account for just over 50% of active listings (REOs make up 24%, while short sales comprise 26.5% of inventory).

The average home sold for $323,772 in November, down 15.2% from last November’s average of $381,666.  Average sold price per square foot is off 16.6% from a year ago, at 188.35% versus last year’s $225.97.  The median sale price in November was $293,000, down 15.1% from last November’s median of $345,000.  Unit volume is off 25.7% compared to last year, but as we mentioned earlier, is strong compared to recent months.

There are 11.21 months of unsold inventory at present in Sacramento County, down from last month’s figure of 11.61 months.

Related links:

The one and only Sacramento Real Estate Gal, Purva Brown, recently called my attention to some really important information for buyers about short sales — their abysmal closing rate.

Many readers of the blog will no doubt already know that a short sale is a sale where the seller has insufficient funds to pay off the loan(s) on the property, and has asked the lender to allow the sale to continue but approve a reduced pay-off instead of going through foreclosure.  Like homes that are already owned by the bank (REOs), short sales are often discounted compared to other homes.

Unlike REO’s — however — there’s a problem.  It’s harder to tell exactly where the problem is than it is to tell you the numbers.  In Sacramento County, for example, as of late November, 2007 short sales accounted for 2,890 of the 11,053 active listings — 26.1%.  At the same time, 16.8% of all listings marked pending sale (in escrow but not yet closed) were short sales.  The pending sales data, moreover, may tend to underreport short sales, since many listing agents will continue to list the home as active until the lender has approved the sale — or even beyond this point.  (Indeed, this practice is common enough that it’s become the subject of an MLS rule prohibiting the practice).

OK, so how many of these short sale transactions are closing?  In October, the number was only 3.8% of sales — so far in November, that number has only risen to only 5.3%.

5.3% of sales, versus 16.8% of pending sales.  In other words, two out of every three short sales transactions (or more) fail to close escrow.

Why the low numbers?

• First of all, understand that the lender doesn’t have to approve the transaction.  They can always foreclose.
• Sometimes buyers find out in the process that short sales are not for them.  When it takes a month or two or longer to get a short sale buyer, many’s the buyer (we’ve worked with some) who’ve simply lost patience or couldn’t wait because of their situation.
• I’ve seen cases where short sales were listed where the buyer was not even behind in their payments.  As a buyer, have your agent ask about the status of the seller.  If they’re not behind in payments, and if there’s not an adequate hardship, the chances of the lender approving the transaction trail off to something pretty close to zero.  Chances are that a large percentage of short sales shouldn’t even be listed.

Can you avoid the short sales and still get a bargain property?  Absolutely!  If you focus on the REOs — bank owned foreclosures — you’ll find homes that are typically priced below the short sales and are much easier to own.  When you look at REOs, the number of homes that close compared to the number that are for sale is actually higher, not lower.  For example, it’s not uncommon to see 12% REOs in inventory, but 25% in the sold statistics (about twice as many).

Related links:

Sometimes when I read the material on my colleagues’ web sites, I almost get the impression that the idea of doing a short sale — a sale where the lender approves a payoff amount less than the value of the loan — is being promoted to sellers almost as a normal sale.

It’s not.  To be sure, if you simply can’t pay off your mortgage and are facing foreclosure anyway, a short sale may offer some advantages, the most important of which is that it may prevent non-purchase money lenders from getting a deficiency judgement against you (refinance or home equity lines of credit are typically non-purchase money and hence the lender has a deficiency judgement as one option in a foreclosure situation).  But you should also be aware of these facts about a short sale.

You Will Be Asked to Show Hardship, and You Have to Tell the Truth
In order to approve a short sale, a lender has to believe that they’re not going to get their money any other way unless they do, and this typically means that you have to show that you can’t pay for some important reason — sickness, death of a spouse, loss of a job, or the like.  Also, if you’re paying off a $100,000 loan and you have a six figure income and good credit, don’t expect the bank to welcome your request that they take a loss.  So you’re going to have to show a hardship, and be aware:  if you lie, that’s loan fraud.

Short sales will not “Save Your Credit” (At Least Not All of It)
If a Realtor® suggests that you can save your credit with a short sale, run, don’t walk.  There is some debate over how much impact a short sale will have on your credit, and it also depends on how the bank reports it, some of which may be negotiable.  However, in general you should only go through the short sale process as a last resort.   Although a short sale may not impact your credit quite as much as a foreclosure, you should still expect to it to have a strong negative impact on your credit.  Whether it’s “as bad” as a foreclosure or bankruptcy or “almost as bad” depends on who you ask.

Once the Short Sale is Over, You May Owe Taxes
There are two possible tax liabilities to a short sale.  First, if the sale results in a gain in value of the property, you may need to pay capital gains tax, regardless of the value of the notes involved.  Secondly, if the lender accepts less than full payment, the difference may be reported to the IRS as taxable income to you.

We’ve improved our Sacramento Foreclosures portion of the site this morning with two enhancements.  First, if you scroll past the foreclosure listings offer, you’ll be rewarded with a set of foreclosure “Frequently Asked Questions”.  Actually, to be perfectly frank, I think the best questions here are the ones that aren’t frequently asked — and that may keep some people from ignoring the real opportunity that buying a foreclosure represents.  We’ve tried to answer those as well.

The second improvement is that we’ve now added Placer County and El Dorado County to the areas where you can browse short sales and bank owned foreclosures.  Those links are all available from the main foreclosure page, but for your convenience, here they are again:

Bank Owned Properties:

El Dorado County

Placer County

Sacramento County

Short Sales:

El Dorado County

Placer County

Sacramento County

Related links:

Recently I’ve been reworking the foreclosure area of the web site and — as promised earlier — I’ve added a page of links where you can browse Sacramento Short Sale Listings. If you’re unfamiliar with Short Sales, what these are are sales where the sellers are “short” in the sense of not having enough cash to sell, pay closing costs, and pay off the lender(s) they owe. So what happens is that you have to get approval from the bank, a process which is fairly time consuming.

That said, there are some bargains to be had in short sales, but (as we recently showed for Antelope and we’ll examine further in a future article), on average the discounts are better on bank owned properties.